Avaya

Grasshopper
Compare features, pricing, and reviews to find the best VoIP solution for your business
Avaya
Avaya stands as a telecommunications veteran that has successfully evolved from traditional PBX systems into a sophisticated cloud communications powerhouse, bringing decades of enterprise expertise to the modern VoIP landscape. This transition has positioned them uniquely among providers who either started cloud-native or are still catching up to enterprise demands.

Grasshopper
Grasshopper has carved out a distinctive niche in the VoIP landscape by focusing relentlessly on solo entrepreneurs and small businesses who want professional phone capabilities without the complexity of enterprise systems. While many providers chase feature-rich platforms packed with video conferencing and advanced integrations, Grasshopper takes a refreshingly different approach: delivering simplicity and professionalism for business owners who just need a reliable phone presence.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Avaya | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $20/user/mo | $168/user/mo |
| Free Trial | No | 7 days |
| Contract Length | month to_month | 1 year |
| Customer Rating | 4 / 5.0 | 4.1 / 5.0 |
| Setup Fee | $0 | $0 |
Pros & Cons
Avaya
Advantages
- Enterprise-grade platform
- Extensive feature set
- Strong security and compliance
- Good for large organizations
Disadvantages
- Complex setup and administration
- Expensive for small businesses
- Learning curve for administrators
- Older interface design
Grasshopper
Advantages
- Perfect for solopreneurs and freelancers
- Very simple setup - no technical knowledge needed
- Affordable pricing for small businesses
- Professional business image on day one
- No hardware required, works with existing phones
Disadvantages
- Limited features compared to enterprise solutions
- No video conferencing capabilities
- Not ideal for teams larger than 5-10 people
- Lacks advanced call center features
Ready to Choose?
Both providers offer free trials. Test them yourself to see which fits better.